Showing posts with label McCain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label McCain. Show all posts

Thursday, April 19, 2007

Fred Thompson on Tour


Or, as they put it at Hotline on call - the Tour De Fred. They are blogging on Mr. Thompson's trip to the House for a meet and greet with Congressmen. Hotline quotes Zach Wamp after the meeting:

On the field: “Fred Thompson actually has the ability to unite America, which our guys were saying was sorely needed.”

“They’re not getting the traction they need. They’re good people but frankly the race started so early that the momentum has been lost by some of them and people are looking for an alternative and they’re looking for more stature, they’re looking for someone who is presidential. Maybe it’s a time where our country is looking for somebody who didn’t crawl all over everyone else to try to become president.”

On social issues: “The conservatives say he checks the boxes but he also transcends our party. He reaches out to the middle. He brings Reagan Democrats back to our party. He has appeal that other candidates simply don’t have.”

If he’s running: “The man that came to see us today, in my view, is preparing to run for president.”


Read the Hotline post here. My own thoughts - Fred Thompson has common sense conservatism and a Reaganesque ability to communicate with thoughfulness and clarity. The importance of the latter cannot be underestimated, particularly in today's climate where one of the greatest failings of the Bush administration and Republicans in Congress has been an almost terminal inability to communicate or to answer the endless attacks of the left. It makes it all the easier to appreciate what Mr. Thompsom brings to the table.

Read More...

Monday, April 9, 2007

McCain on the News from Iraq We Aren't Hearing

This editorial by Senator John McCain in today's Washington Post:

I just returned from my fifth visit to Iraq since 2003 -- and my first since Gen. David Petraeus's new strategy has started taking effect. For the first time, our delegation was able to drive, not use helicopters, from the airport to downtown Baghdad. For the first time, we met with Sunni tribal leaders in Anbar province who are working with American and Iraqi forces to combat al-Qaeda. For the first time, we visited Iraqi and American forces deployed in a joint security station in Baghdad -- an integral part of the new strategy. We held a news conference to discuss what we saw: positive signs, underreported in the United States, that are reason for cautious optimism.

. . . The new political-military strategy is beginning to show results. But most Americans are not aware because much of the media are not reporting it or devote far more attention to car bombs and mortar attacks that reveal little about the strategic direction of the war. I am not saying that bad news should not be reported or that horrific terrorist attacks are not newsworthy. But news coverage should also include evidence of progress. Whether Americans choose to support or oppose our efforts in Iraq, I hope they could make their decision based on as complete a picture of the situation in Iraq as is possible to report. A few examples:

· Sunni sheikhs in Anbar are now fighting al-Qaeda. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki visited Anbar's capital, Ramadi, to meet with Sunni tribal leaders. The newly proposed de-Baathification legislation grew out of that meeting. Police recruitment in Ramadi has increased dramatically over the past four months.

· More than 50 joint U.S.-Iraqi stations have been established in Baghdad. Regular patrols establish connections with the surrounding neighborhood, resulting in a significant increase in security and actionable intelligence.

· Extremist Shiite militia leader Moqtada al-Sadr is in hiding, his followers are not contesting American forces, sectarian violence has dropped in Baghdad and we are working with the Shiite mayor of Sadr City.

· Iraqi army and police forces are increasingly fighting on their own and with American forces, and their size and capability are growing. Iraqi army and police casualties have increased because they are fighting more.

. . . There is no guarantee that we will succeed, but we must try. As every sensible observer has concluded, the consequences of failure in Iraq are so grave and so threatening for the region, and to the security of the United States, that to refuse to give Petraeus's plan a chance to succeed would constitute a tragic failure of American resolve. I hope those who cite the Iraq Study Group's conclusions note that James Baker wrote on this page last week that we must have bipartisan support for giving the new strategy time to succeed. This is not a moment for partisan gamesmanship or for one-sided reporting. The stakes are just too high.
Read the entire article here. As to McCain's complaint of underreporting of positive news from Iraq, it is worthy of note that McCain's Iraq visit and his newsconference on this same topic was not only underreported in many quarters of the MSM, but mocked in the NY Times, who covered it by juxtaposing McCain's news conference with other news of U.S. casualties from Iraq:
4 G.I.'s Among Dead In Iraq; McCain Cites Progress.

Mortar attacks, suicide car bombs, roadside bombs, ambushes and gun battles killed at least two dozen people on Sunday, including four American soldiers, the authorities said.


The American military command said the soldiers were killed southwest of Baghdad just after midnight as they responded to an earlier bombing that had killed two other American soldiers. The insurgents have frequently tried to reap greater death tolls by carrying out attacks against rescue crews rushing to bomb sites. . .


The report continues on with some short notes about McCain's news conference, but no substantive news about whether the surge is in fact succeeding in its counterinsurgency mission inside Baghdad proper. Reading this, one might almost suspect that there is not only the ommission of positive news from Iraq of which McCain complains, but more then a bit of active media bias.

Read More...

Monday, April 2, 2007

CNN's Michael Ware Suffering PMS?

By PMS, I don't mean Pre-Menstrual Syndrome, though I admit not knowing Mr. Ware's estrogen levels. Rather I mean Partisan Meltdown Syndrome. Partisan Meltodwn Syndrome only became an accepted clinical diagnosis among unhappy liberals shortly after the screaming incident by Howard Dean several years ago. That it should be found today in particularly virulent form among CNN reporters is no surprise, as it has long been suspected that patient zero was Ted Turner himself. There is no known cure at the present, though apparently watching repeated showings of Michael Moore's Farenheit 9-11 and then joining in a Code Pink or MoveOn.org protest march can have a temporary palliative effect. The latest confirmed diagnosis of full blown PMS is that of CNN reporter Mr. Michael Ware. As documented in a Drudge Report exclusive:

During a live press conference in Baghdad, Senators McCain and Graham were heckled by CNN reporter Michael Ware. An official at the press conference called Ware’s conduct “outrageous,” saying, “here you have two United States Senators in Bagdad giving first-hand reports while Ware is laughing and mocking their comments. I’ve never witnessed such disrespect. This guy is an activist not a reporter.”

Senators McCain and Graham flew into Iraq and drove into Baghdad, making stops at an open market and a joint Iraq/American military security outpost before appearing at the press conference.This is not the first time Michael Ware has taken issue with Senator McCain’s comments about early progress in Iraq.

Last week, after Senator McCain told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that he needed to catch up on the news coming out of Iraq, Michael Ware responded, saying: “I don't know what part of Neverland Senator McCain is talking about when he says we can go strolling in Baghdad.”

Michael Ware has also publicly expressed his views on the war last year in an interview with Bill Maher, saying, “I've been given a front-row ticket to watch this slow-motion train wreck … I try to stay as drunk for as long as possible while I'm here … In fact, I'm drinking now.”
Actually, the incident with McCain and Blitzer was examined by Powerline, particularly Ware's assertion that violence was down in only one measure - sectarian violence - while by other measures, such as the number of car bombings, there was actually an increase in violence in Baghdad since the start of the surge. Powerline checked the positions of both McCain and Ware, ultimately concluding
Ware [made a] statement that "sectarian violence -- one type of sectarian violence -- is down." The statistics show that Iraqi deaths in Baghdad are down substantially. So I guess the type of sectarian violence that's down is the kind that kills people. And wasn't that, after all, the primary purpose of the surge?
On CNN's website, there is no mention of Ware at the Baghdad news conference with McCain and Graham. Likewise, Ware's name does not appear on the byline for the CNN article, McCain Lauds Security During Baghdad Visit, about the Senators' visit and news conference. Nonetheless, it seems that Ware's PMS is highly infectious among his fellow liberal reporters at CNN. The story CNN does carry, under the byline of Mohammed Tawfeeq and Candy Crowley manages to get in some cheap shots, apparently without any help from Ware.
Sen. John McCain visited a Baghdad market Sunday and later told reporters the American people were not getting the full story on what he said were improving security conditions in the war-ravaged capital.

McCain, a presidential hopeful, was among a delegation of Republican lawmakers that made an unannounced trip to Iraq this weekend, the details of which were withheld for security reasons.

The delegation traveled in armored Humvees with a military escort. . . .
Do you think Candy could have spun this any harder to suggest McCain is lying to the American public about an improving security situation? These facts have no bearing on whether the security situation in Baghdad has improved. Similar security measures are common for high level visits to potentially unfriendly places, regardless if the security situation is relatively good or dire. But mentioning that in her report would spoil the effect of the ad hominem attack - and such would be contraindicative of PMS.

Alas, it is apparent that Ms. Crowley is closing in on the advanced stages of PMS herself. As the disease is invariably "progressive," watch her upcoming reports to begin with something akin to "Lying Bastard Baby Killer McCain and Idiot War Mongering Republicans Claim . . . "

UPDATE: It has long been known that the NYT has numerous reporters in various stages of PMS. It was just pointed out to me that NYT's reporter Kirk Semple in fact has a case of PMS already advanced to a degree beyond that of Ms. Crowley. On the McCain story, where Mr. McCain was attempting to convery to the public that the security situation was improving in Baghdad because of the surge, Mr. Semple authored a report of McCain's news conference, but juxtaposed that story and the headline with the sad news concerning American casualties outside of Baghdad:

4 G.I.'s Among Dead In Iraq; McCain Cites Progress.

Mortar attacks, suicide car bombs, roadside bombs, ambushes and gun battles killed at least two dozen people on Sunday, including four American soldiers, the authorities said.

The American military command said the soldiers were killed southwest of Baghdad just after midnight as they responded to an earlier bombing that had killed two other American soldiers. The insurgents have frequently tried to reap greater death tolls by carrying out attacks against rescue crews rushing to bomb sites. . .

The report continues on with some short notes about McCain's news conference, but no substantive news about whether the surge is in fact succeeding in its counterinsurgency mission inside Baghdad proper. It would appear fair to say that Mr. Semple likewise a case of PMS quickly advancing towards the end stage.


Read More...

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

U.S. POLITICS FROM ACROSS THE POND. A Brit opines why Giuliani should be the next Republican nominee over McCain. I am a bit torn on this one. I much preferred McCain over Bush in the 2000 election. And as much as I still respect McCain, I think that Giuliani is more electable now.

Read More...

 

View My Stats